This episode was a great tribute to Phil Donahue. It provided a clear example of the problem with corporate dominance of the news media.
Now we need Ralph to provide an even greater tribute to Phil by doing something about the corporate dominance of the news media.
Ralph should start a non-profit corporation to buy up/start up a news media conglomerate owned by ordinary citizens overseen by a board of people like Ralph.
Shares would be sold for 100 dollars each, could only be owned by American citizens, no one person could own more than ten shares and the shares could only be sold for 100 dollars as the purpose of owning the shares is to control the news media conglomerate and not to make money on the price of the shares.
Just 6-7% of the 150 million 2020 voters buying one share each would total 1 billion dollars to start this Phil Donahue Memorial Public Owned Media Network.
I must disagree with Jeff Cohen's assessment that his Step Aside Joe campaign worked. It is possible that Joe stepping aside could have been the Corporate Dem strategy all along.
Why risk Kamala Harris having to run in a possible contested primary when Joe could run unopposed and then drop out after the primary?
In order for the Step Aside Joe campaign to work it would have had to work before the primaries.
All week long, the nation watched as the true base of the Democratic Party – billionaires, celebrities, national security figureheads and “moderate Republicans” – repeatedly assured us that Kamala Harris will be a different kind of president. A president of “joy.”
But I found little room for joy in Harris’ speech Thursday night.
Instead, it revealed a great deal about what we can expect if Kamala Harris becomes president – and none of it is good.
In a speech that could have easily been delivered by Genocide Joe himself, Harris promised to:
Sign Biden’s inhumane, militarized “bipartisan border bill” with 80% of the funding allocated to hardening border security and DOUBLING the number of border patrol agents.
“Ensure America always has the strongest, most lethal fighting force in the world” with unchecked resources for the Pentagon to continue waging “wars around the world” (to quote our current president).
Unconditionally supply Israel with endless weapons, as she repeated Israel’s discredited propaganda around the October 7th attacks and pointedly ignored the widespread reports of Israeli soldiers using sexual violence, physical and psychological torture against illegally incarcerated Palestinian prisoners.
Harris absurdly claimed that she and Biden are “working around the clock” to secure a ceasefire for Gaza – even as they’ve authorized another $23 BILLION in arms for Israel in August alone.
Now we learn that the Biden-Harris administration has appointed Mira Resnick, perhaps the most hands-on State Department official involved in speedrunning weapons to Israel since October 7th, to replace Andrew Miller – the 1st official to resign in protest over Gaza.
Harris’ empire of lies delivered on Thursday night firmly established that “nothing will fundamentally change.”
Harris made it clear that she intends to continue this reckless path of capitalistic exploitation and global militarism, even fanning the flames with China and Iran as tens of thousands of the party faithful waved signs and shouted “USA! USA!”
I find no “joy” in any of this.
There are material conditions that must be urgently addressed for this country to meet the basic needs of its citizens and take us off this death march into World War III and climate collapse. NONE of those policy solutions were present in Harris’ speech.
Instead we were promised more of the same. And much like Biden before her, that may prove to be the one promise that Kamala Harris keeps. Jill Stein, 8/24/24
“There are material conditions that must be urgently addressed for this country to meet the basic needs of its citizens and take us off this death march into World War III and climate collapse. NONE of those policy solutions were present in Harris’ speech.”
That’s quite true, Robert. Based on what we’ve seen from the last two presidential administrations, what is published from the prominent think tanks, and what the Democratic Party seemingly wishes to continue based on the comments made at the Convention which you mention, there are a few trends I notice:
A. Both parties, and perhaps even more so the Democrats, are using increased military industry spending as domestic policy to increase domestic employment and as foreign policy to increase their hegemonic position.
B. Both parties, probably equally, are taking an aggressive stance towards foreign countries, including neighbors and allies such as Canada, who use public funds to strengthening their industries. This pressure has always existed in the post-Bretton Woods era, but this hegemonic pressure is increasing through trade policy and through aggressive foreign policy posturing as we see with China. Meanwhile, the US has no problem subsidizing their own industries, as seen in point A.
C. Given how gravely destructive the military industry is to the environment even if weapons are simply manufactured and never used, and how the Democratic Party has perhaps become even more of the ‘drill, baby, drill’ party in terms of oil/fossil fuels than the Republicans even, we know that these parties do not take environmental protection seriously at all.
So, how does the public counter these destructive policies?
1. The public must realize the economic realities of a federal budget which uses a fiat currency. This is what enables point A above to the degree which we see it today.
2. With that, the public must question why the US, and the Democratic Party especially, have chosen a destructive path towards increasing domestic employment and US hegemony rather than a peace-oriented path, which is quite easily achievable, and which would still keep the US as a leader internationally in promoting and implementing a successful peace-oriented economic strategy.
3. Given point 1 above, there is no excuse for the federal government to not offer substantive healthcare reform, etc.
4. This is as vital as point 1. Any potential policy reforms must, and absolutely must, keep people employed at a similar wage level, if not higher, without relocation and without burdensome retraining. This involves more complex policymaking, but it is economically feasible to support such policymaking given point 1.
The Donahue obituaries get it wrong because it is not primarily the job of the “news” to inform but to administer propaganda. Chomsky and Parenti told us about this in the 80s, Caitlin Johnstone reminds us of it constantly today.
Jeff Cohen, of all people, should know this by now. It is not in the interests of the parties whom the media that the NYT and the other mainstream usual suspects speak for to tell the truth about why Phil Donahue was fired from MSNBC, no matter how many years after the fact. Therefore, that media will continue, with perhaps some strategic exceptions, to tell the false story using their usual permissible “ratings” tropes no matter how many requests for correction there are or “WTF?” phone calls to one’s friends in high places inside these organizations.
It’s frustrating to think that the founder of FAIR doesn’t grasp this obvious fact. Of course he does grasp it, but no one interested in educating the public about the media should hesitate to say that this kind of distortion is intentional, not merely negligent or incompetent (although it could be those things too), even if the evidence of intent is circumstantial, although it is frequently more than circumstantial.
This is important because it leads logically to certain courses of action, and certain applications of political energy, as opposed to others, depending on whether one thinks that the media behaves this way because it just made a mistake or innocently overlooked a crucial fact, or because it is consciously suppressing a part of reality that is inconvenient for its owners or other powerful groups. It is also important because, when such distortion is clearly present, it will or will not mislead the public that one presumably seeks to educate about how the media operates, and the reasons why it is unreliable, depending on whether one criticizes the media for such distortion or for ordinary human fallibility.
I only infrequently saw Phil Donahue’s daytime show since I have rarely been a position where I could watch daytime television. I know that Mr. Nader has spoken glowingly over the years about Donahue’s contributions towards progressive causes. When I heard that Donahue had died a few days ago, I immediately thought of Ralph Nader and figured a program like this would be offered. As someone who did not see much of Donahue’s work, it is interesting to hear about his contributions and how he achieved them.
Related to the first point in Francesco DeSantis’ segment, the one about grocery prices, I did hear about Harris’ ‘economic plan’ and the part about the grocery industry. I immediately thought of Justin Trudeau’s wet noodle threats about grocery prices in Canada a few months back and I would not be surprised if Harris’ threats are much the same as Trudeau’s if she wins the election given that most of the rest of her economic plan is corporate welfare, some of it inflationary, which continues to allow corporations to rob citizens in one area to make up for minor reforms in other areas rather than implementing meaningful policy towards curbing neoliberalism. Keeping Lina Khan around, and giving her more support and resources, would be a good start though. Even with that, there are hardly any guarantees and the autocratic way Harris was selected means the public was robbed of the democratic tests the electorate could have used to vet candidates.
I recommend reading the whole FTC report which one can get to following the link provided by the RNRH staff. Some of the summaries of the report, including the FTC’s own, could be described as political click-bait which is not reflective of the totality of the report. The full report, at least the first 20 pages, gives a clearer picture of matters and gives good justifications for fighting industry consolidation in the production, wholesale, and retail sectors of the industry (and some large grocers, like Kroger, are involved in all three aspects). That said, while I know the report is focused on the impact of Covid on grocery prices, there are a few elephants in the room with the report. The report completely ignores energy price instability, specifically instability caused by US foreign policy, on grocery prices during the 2020+ era studied. The report also completely ignores weather-related factors on grocery prices and how the current administration’s ‘drill, drill, drill’ energy policy and foreign misadventures add to a climate disaster and how that will impact future grocery prices. The US’ war on foreign countries subsidizing their industries, while the US continues to subsidize their private industry, is also ignored as a potential inflationary factor.
The report is not specific in this area, but I wonder if they factored for increased profits by the grocery segment through the US’ health policy and if grocery stores with successful pharmacies, usually the largest grocers as the smaller grocers are getting out of the pharmacy business due to increased integration on the insurance side, profited from selling Covid-related pharmaceuticals. If so, that is worthy information to include in the report in order to give the public a more complete picture of the industry.
One often-ignored aspect on grocery competition, at least on the retail side, relates to real estate policy (there is also huge impact of real estate and agricultural policy on the production side, but I will put that aside for now). For example, here in Texas, the large regional chain, HEB, is known to buy empty grocery buildings and empty land and they will just sit on them to keep competition out of areas where their stores exist or hope to exist at some point. In other cases, they’ll sublet those properties to other retailers, but only those not selling groceries. Such actions have contributed to them having a near-monopoly in traditional supermarkets in much of South and Central Texas. Also, with ‘master-planned communities’ becoming more prevalent here in Texas at least, there are concerns whether exclusivity real estate deals made by the property owners mean that neighborhoods lack meaningful grocery competition. Furthermore, we’ve lost some independent grocery stores here in Houston recently, mostly ones serving low-income areas, due to the landlords believing that subdividing a large grocery space into multiple smaller storefronts for other kinds of non-grocery retail is more profitable.
Finally, when we talk about the need for competition, the need for ‘value’ is just as important as absolute pricing. When consumers go to the grocery store and see fewer employees to assist them and maintain the store, they may feel they are getting poor value especially as food prices increase. When perishables are not up to the quality they used to be, that may be considered poor value. Stores and producers compete on more than just price, there is a quality factor as well. And, of course, there are the labor advantages of competition as well.
It seems like this guy Jeff Cohen should have seen this coming and wrecked the Phil Donahue show by having him on MSNBC with a big contract. They should have seen that they were at high risk of termination and should have innovatively sought another option.
I worked for IBM in the 70's in sales and marketing and Phil Donahue always reminded me of the sales representative that dressed well , and did and said all the right things and got promoted ,,,,but in real life he was somebody else somebody different.
After hours the real Phil showed up .
And there he was doing that Afternoon TV talk show .doing things that at IBM you would get fired for ,
He called things as he saw them .
You don't tell the CEO of a Fortune 500 company you're making more profits at the expense of your loyal employees because you're not paying them a fair wage. If one of your employees said the quality of work is below standard and rivets will fail and lives will be lost and they are ignored and demoted or penalized ,,,that after hours Phil is the man to call and he won't ignore your call .
And just think Danny Thomas's daughter got lucky and married the guy . As Phil Donahue would say ," a 44 year run at any ball park would be great ".
There weren't a lot of celebrities in the town I lived in, outside of Chicago, while I was in high school during the late 1970s. But I befriended a smart kid named Jim whose father was big in daytime TV, which I didn't watch much of.
If I didn't know better, I'd have just though he was Jim's dad rather than a TV star. He really was an affable, down-to-earth guy, and that's from someone who knew him at the height of his fame. Yes, he had unmistakable hair. I can't remember if it was more gray in those days, or white but several times he and Jim gave me a ride to school.
I remember his father driving and Jim in the passenger seat as I was on the back seat and us waiting at stoplights. I would look at other motorists as they sat in cars facing the opposite direction, looking bored as they peered across the intersection and then, suddenly, recognized Jim's father.
Later, I learned, Jim's dad did thousands of shows with great guests like Ralph Nader. But his legacy will be being fired from MSNBC for refusing to be a propagandist. I understand MSNBC these days would make anyone embarrassed to be an American.
In other words, with Mr. Donahue, as my friends and I called him, it wasn't just the hair.
Do we want to live in a FREE Society or under a form of self-imposed TOTALITARISM, with the ignorant herd marginalized, misdirected to endless consumption and entertainment, terrified, screaming patriotic slogans, fearing for their lives, and admiring with awe new the leader who saved them from destruction, while the educated masses goose-step on command and repeat the slogans they're conditioned to repeat and the Society deteriorates at Home.
This was another excellent episode. Thank you all. I listen to all of your shows and am a huge fan of Ralph and his many years of incredible work. I just wanted to make sure you were all aware of this recent podcast episode in which Ralph is a major figure. https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/master-plan/id1723377799?i=1000668127115
I think this covers a very important chapter of US history and I strongly suggest you try get these guys on your show. Love and Godspeed to you all. 🦋
This episode was a great tribute to Phil Donahue. It provided a clear example of the problem with corporate dominance of the news media.
Now we need Ralph to provide an even greater tribute to Phil by doing something about the corporate dominance of the news media.
Ralph should start a non-profit corporation to buy up/start up a news media conglomerate owned by ordinary citizens overseen by a board of people like Ralph.
Shares would be sold for 100 dollars each, could only be owned by American citizens, no one person could own more than ten shares and the shares could only be sold for 100 dollars as the purpose of owning the shares is to control the news media conglomerate and not to make money on the price of the shares.
Just 6-7% of the 150 million 2020 voters buying one share each would total 1 billion dollars to start this Phil Donahue Memorial Public Owned Media Network.
Ralph - you handsome guy you.
;)
I must disagree with Jeff Cohen's assessment that his Step Aside Joe campaign worked. It is possible that Joe stepping aside could have been the Corporate Dem strategy all along.
Why risk Kamala Harris having to run in a possible contested primary when Joe could run unopposed and then drop out after the primary?
In order for the Step Aside Joe campaign to work it would have had to work before the primaries.
All week long, the nation watched as the true base of the Democratic Party – billionaires, celebrities, national security figureheads and “moderate Republicans” – repeatedly assured us that Kamala Harris will be a different kind of president. A president of “joy.”
But I found little room for joy in Harris’ speech Thursday night.
Instead, it revealed a great deal about what we can expect if Kamala Harris becomes president – and none of it is good.
In a speech that could have easily been delivered by Genocide Joe himself, Harris promised to:
Sign Biden’s inhumane, militarized “bipartisan border bill” with 80% of the funding allocated to hardening border security and DOUBLING the number of border patrol agents.
“Ensure America always has the strongest, most lethal fighting force in the world” with unchecked resources for the Pentagon to continue waging “wars around the world” (to quote our current president).
Unconditionally supply Israel with endless weapons, as she repeated Israel’s discredited propaganda around the October 7th attacks and pointedly ignored the widespread reports of Israeli soldiers using sexual violence, physical and psychological torture against illegally incarcerated Palestinian prisoners.
Harris absurdly claimed that she and Biden are “working around the clock” to secure a ceasefire for Gaza – even as they’ve authorized another $23 BILLION in arms for Israel in August alone.
Now we learn that the Biden-Harris administration has appointed Mira Resnick, perhaps the most hands-on State Department official involved in speedrunning weapons to Israel since October 7th, to replace Andrew Miller – the 1st official to resign in protest over Gaza.
Harris’ empire of lies delivered on Thursday night firmly established that “nothing will fundamentally change.”
Harris made it clear that she intends to continue this reckless path of capitalistic exploitation and global militarism, even fanning the flames with China and Iran as tens of thousands of the party faithful waved signs and shouted “USA! USA!”
I find no “joy” in any of this.
There are material conditions that must be urgently addressed for this country to meet the basic needs of its citizens and take us off this death march into World War III and climate collapse. NONE of those policy solutions were present in Harris’ speech.
Instead we were promised more of the same. And much like Biden before her, that may prove to be the one promise that Kamala Harris keeps. Jill Stein, 8/24/24
“There are material conditions that must be urgently addressed for this country to meet the basic needs of its citizens and take us off this death march into World War III and climate collapse. NONE of those policy solutions were present in Harris’ speech.”
That’s quite true, Robert. Based on what we’ve seen from the last two presidential administrations, what is published from the prominent think tanks, and what the Democratic Party seemingly wishes to continue based on the comments made at the Convention which you mention, there are a few trends I notice:
A. Both parties, and perhaps even more so the Democrats, are using increased military industry spending as domestic policy to increase domestic employment and as foreign policy to increase their hegemonic position.
B. Both parties, probably equally, are taking an aggressive stance towards foreign countries, including neighbors and allies such as Canada, who use public funds to strengthening their industries. This pressure has always existed in the post-Bretton Woods era, but this hegemonic pressure is increasing through trade policy and through aggressive foreign policy posturing as we see with China. Meanwhile, the US has no problem subsidizing their own industries, as seen in point A.
C. Given how gravely destructive the military industry is to the environment even if weapons are simply manufactured and never used, and how the Democratic Party has perhaps become even more of the ‘drill, baby, drill’ party in terms of oil/fossil fuels than the Republicans even, we know that these parties do not take environmental protection seriously at all.
So, how does the public counter these destructive policies?
1. The public must realize the economic realities of a federal budget which uses a fiat currency. This is what enables point A above to the degree which we see it today.
2. With that, the public must question why the US, and the Democratic Party especially, have chosen a destructive path towards increasing domestic employment and US hegemony rather than a peace-oriented path, which is quite easily achievable, and which would still keep the US as a leader internationally in promoting and implementing a successful peace-oriented economic strategy.
3. Given point 1 above, there is no excuse for the federal government to not offer substantive healthcare reform, etc.
4. This is as vital as point 1. Any potential policy reforms must, and absolutely must, keep people employed at a similar wage level, if not higher, without relocation and without burdensome retraining. This involves more complex policymaking, but it is economically feasible to support such policymaking given point 1.
The Donahue obituaries get it wrong because it is not primarily the job of the “news” to inform but to administer propaganda. Chomsky and Parenti told us about this in the 80s, Caitlin Johnstone reminds us of it constantly today.
Jeff Cohen, of all people, should know this by now. It is not in the interests of the parties whom the media that the NYT and the other mainstream usual suspects speak for to tell the truth about why Phil Donahue was fired from MSNBC, no matter how many years after the fact. Therefore, that media will continue, with perhaps some strategic exceptions, to tell the false story using their usual permissible “ratings” tropes no matter how many requests for correction there are or “WTF?” phone calls to one’s friends in high places inside these organizations.
It’s frustrating to think that the founder of FAIR doesn’t grasp this obvious fact. Of course he does grasp it, but no one interested in educating the public about the media should hesitate to say that this kind of distortion is intentional, not merely negligent or incompetent (although it could be those things too), even if the evidence of intent is circumstantial, although it is frequently more than circumstantial.
This is important because it leads logically to certain courses of action, and certain applications of political energy, as opposed to others, depending on whether one thinks that the media behaves this way because it just made a mistake or innocently overlooked a crucial fact, or because it is consciously suppressing a part of reality that is inconvenient for its owners or other powerful groups. It is also important because, when such distortion is clearly present, it will or will not mislead the public that one presumably seeks to educate about how the media operates, and the reasons why it is unreliable, depending on whether one criticizes the media for such distortion or for ordinary human fallibility.
I only infrequently saw Phil Donahue’s daytime show since I have rarely been a position where I could watch daytime television. I know that Mr. Nader has spoken glowingly over the years about Donahue’s contributions towards progressive causes. When I heard that Donahue had died a few days ago, I immediately thought of Ralph Nader and figured a program like this would be offered. As someone who did not see much of Donahue’s work, it is interesting to hear about his contributions and how he achieved them.
Related to the first point in Francesco DeSantis’ segment, the one about grocery prices, I did hear about Harris’ ‘economic plan’ and the part about the grocery industry. I immediately thought of Justin Trudeau’s wet noodle threats about grocery prices in Canada a few months back and I would not be surprised if Harris’ threats are much the same as Trudeau’s if she wins the election given that most of the rest of her economic plan is corporate welfare, some of it inflationary, which continues to allow corporations to rob citizens in one area to make up for minor reforms in other areas rather than implementing meaningful policy towards curbing neoliberalism. Keeping Lina Khan around, and giving her more support and resources, would be a good start though. Even with that, there are hardly any guarantees and the autocratic way Harris was selected means the public was robbed of the democratic tests the electorate could have used to vet candidates.
I recommend reading the whole FTC report which one can get to following the link provided by the RNRH staff. Some of the summaries of the report, including the FTC’s own, could be described as political click-bait which is not reflective of the totality of the report. The full report, at least the first 20 pages, gives a clearer picture of matters and gives good justifications for fighting industry consolidation in the production, wholesale, and retail sectors of the industry (and some large grocers, like Kroger, are involved in all three aspects). That said, while I know the report is focused on the impact of Covid on grocery prices, there are a few elephants in the room with the report. The report completely ignores energy price instability, specifically instability caused by US foreign policy, on grocery prices during the 2020+ era studied. The report also completely ignores weather-related factors on grocery prices and how the current administration’s ‘drill, drill, drill’ energy policy and foreign misadventures add to a climate disaster and how that will impact future grocery prices. The US’ war on foreign countries subsidizing their industries, while the US continues to subsidize their private industry, is also ignored as a potential inflationary factor.
The report is not specific in this area, but I wonder if they factored for increased profits by the grocery segment through the US’ health policy and if grocery stores with successful pharmacies, usually the largest grocers as the smaller grocers are getting out of the pharmacy business due to increased integration on the insurance side, profited from selling Covid-related pharmaceuticals. If so, that is worthy information to include in the report in order to give the public a more complete picture of the industry.
One often-ignored aspect on grocery competition, at least on the retail side, relates to real estate policy (there is also huge impact of real estate and agricultural policy on the production side, but I will put that aside for now). For example, here in Texas, the large regional chain, HEB, is known to buy empty grocery buildings and empty land and they will just sit on them to keep competition out of areas where their stores exist or hope to exist at some point. In other cases, they’ll sublet those properties to other retailers, but only those not selling groceries. Such actions have contributed to them having a near-monopoly in traditional supermarkets in much of South and Central Texas. Also, with ‘master-planned communities’ becoming more prevalent here in Texas at least, there are concerns whether exclusivity real estate deals made by the property owners mean that neighborhoods lack meaningful grocery competition. Furthermore, we’ve lost some independent grocery stores here in Houston recently, mostly ones serving low-income areas, due to the landlords believing that subdividing a large grocery space into multiple smaller storefronts for other kinds of non-grocery retail is more profitable.
Finally, when we talk about the need for competition, the need for ‘value’ is just as important as absolute pricing. When consumers go to the grocery store and see fewer employees to assist them and maintain the store, they may feel they are getting poor value especially as food prices increase. When perishables are not up to the quality they used to be, that may be considered poor value. Stores and producers compete on more than just price, there is a quality factor as well. And, of course, there are the labor advantages of competition as well.
Thanks for bringing on Phil the free speech guru!
It seems like this guy Jeff Cohen should have seen this coming and wrecked the Phil Donahue show by having him on MSNBC with a big contract. They should have seen that they were at high risk of termination and should have innovatively sought another option.
I worked for IBM in the 70's in sales and marketing and Phil Donahue always reminded me of the sales representative that dressed well , and did and said all the right things and got promoted ,,,,but in real life he was somebody else somebody different.
After hours the real Phil showed up .
And there he was doing that Afternoon TV talk show .doing things that at IBM you would get fired for ,
He called things as he saw them .
You don't tell the CEO of a Fortune 500 company you're making more profits at the expense of your loyal employees because you're not paying them a fair wage. If one of your employees said the quality of work is below standard and rivets will fail and lives will be lost and they are ignored and demoted or penalized ,,,that after hours Phil is the man to call and he won't ignore your call .
And just think Danny Thomas's daughter got lucky and married the guy . As Phil Donahue would say ," a 44 year run at any ball park would be great ".
Have a great day my friends
,
There weren't a lot of celebrities in the town I lived in, outside of Chicago, while I was in high school during the late 1970s. But I befriended a smart kid named Jim whose father was big in daytime TV, which I didn't watch much of.
If I didn't know better, I'd have just though he was Jim's dad rather than a TV star. He really was an affable, down-to-earth guy, and that's from someone who knew him at the height of his fame. Yes, he had unmistakable hair. I can't remember if it was more gray in those days, or white but several times he and Jim gave me a ride to school.
I remember his father driving and Jim in the passenger seat as I was on the back seat and us waiting at stoplights. I would look at other motorists as they sat in cars facing the opposite direction, looking bored as they peered across the intersection and then, suddenly, recognized Jim's father.
Later, I learned, Jim's dad did thousands of shows with great guests like Ralph Nader. But his legacy will be being fired from MSNBC for refusing to be a propagandist. I understand MSNBC these days would make anyone embarrassed to be an American.
In other words, with Mr. Donahue, as my friends and I called him, it wasn't just the hair.
anyone remember Pozner and Donahue show? it was a great show! they got booted off of MSNBC then as well I believe
❓Where is Bruce Fein’s Analysis of the DNCs Convention Corruption❓
🌀😵💫 Imagine If You Will . . . 😵💫🌀
YOU are the Instructor / Professor of the Speech & Debate Class these 2 are taking. The CapStone Assignment of your course is,
“Write A Speech that convinces Your Party to Nominate YOU to be Their Candidate for the U.S. Presidency ~
You, plead the Republicans Case and You the Democrat’s”
With what Options would THIS Result leave you❓
🔸Convention Speeches Comparison
NO Daylight between the Platform “Plan” of U.S. Republicans / Democrats ( ReThuglicRatz ?)
by
JILL STEIN - YouTube Channel,
HARRIS TRUMP: UniParty on the same script
https://youtu.be/mleP7lhmHFI
Do we want to live in a FREE Society or under a form of self-imposed TOTALITARISM, with the ignorant herd marginalized, misdirected to endless consumption and entertainment, terrified, screaming patriotic slogans, fearing for their lives, and admiring with awe new the leader who saved them from destruction, while the educated masses goose-step on command and repeat the slogans they're conditioned to repeat and the Society deteriorates at Home.
Got anything on The Jesuit Order?
The Entire History on 'The Jesuit Order' + The Plans of World Domination full length documentary (2021) movados242 on YTube
This was another excellent episode. Thank you all. I listen to all of your shows and am a huge fan of Ralph and his many years of incredible work. I just wanted to make sure you were all aware of this recent podcast episode in which Ralph is a major figure. https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/master-plan/id1723377799?i=1000668127115
I think this covers a very important chapter of US history and I strongly suggest you try get these guys on your show. Love and Godspeed to you all. 🦋