Boeing whistleblower, Ed Pierson, joins us to talk about the report he wrote entitled “Boeing 737 MAX – How Is It Really Going?” that paints a troubling picture of current problems with the notorious plane that includes reports of 43 malfunctions and onboard failures and six flights where U.S. pilots declared emergencies. Plus, constitutional scholar, Bruce Fein, stops by to talk about how the NATO Treaty should not override the US Constitution, the misuse of the “state secrets” law, and an ongoing U.S. war crime from the Vietnam era.
4 Comments
A detailed analysis and time-line of the Boeing chronic homicidal negligence, thank you Ed Pierson.
So why do other aviation builder designers, for example Airbus, have but a tiny fraction of the catastrophic SNAFUS of Boeing? I’d say it’s because Boeing is a defense contractor so it’s disregard for life is unavoidable. But other war suppliers are producing commercial aircraft without the carnage, eg., General Dynamic Inc among others.
The US DOT missing in action is scandalous business as usual, so zero tolerance for that too. And the popular news media is all over this stinking heap of corporatist injustice.
I would like to know if there is a transcript of this program? I, despite hearing aids in both ears, can not fully benefit from the presentations.
Look for a transcript to be posted either Monday or Tuesday. It will be a blue pdf link just above the audio player.
When are you going to add comments to your blog?
Part three of your assumed ten part plan to use 10 billion fictional dollars from enlightened billionaires was a nice exercise in theory, but it does not translate to reality as fictional dollars do not have purchasing power in the real world.
Please provide a PSA that could have an effect in the real world before you continue the other seven parts as by the time you get through the other seven parts you will have squandered another opportunity that exists to make real progress in 2022 that could change the dynamic for 2024.
Just 6-7% of the 150 million 2020 voters investing 100 dollars in contributions to small donor candidates in 2022 (no more than 200 dollars from any one donor per election-200 primary, 200 general) would total 1 billion dollars. This would also total 10 billion dollars over ten years and is much less likely to be fictional than the 10 billion from enlightened billionaires.
This 6-7% making a demand that candidates run small donor only campaigns could be joined by as little as another 3-5% of voters in 2022 that do not or cannot afford to contribute in 2022 for a total of 10% of the vote nationally in 2022.
This 10% of the vote will be below the average in some districts and above the average in some districts in 2022.
In districts above the average it could result in a small donor candidate winning a Current Major Party primary.
In the general election it in districts at or above the average it could flip a district gerrymandered for one CMP to the other CMP if there was a CMP small donor candidate running in the district gerrymandered for the other party.
Or a small donor third party or independent candidate getting 10% or more in district could cause that district to flip.
This would put many more gerrymandered districts in question in 2024, encourage more citizens to participate in demanding small donor candidates in 2024 and would also inspire more small donor candidates in 2024.
And by 2026 there would many small donor legislators that would not require spending 100 million dollars a year on each issue in your ten part plan to lobby against the millions more than 100 million the big money interests are spending to “wine, dine and give campaign cash to the 535 members of Congress” as the small donor legislators would not be taking the campaign cash.
Let’s kill ten birds with one stone and demand small donor only candidates now.